Strong racket-sports reference including squash: multi-angle streaming, scoreboard/score, replay, analysis and highlight workflows.
More play.
Higher revenue.
We connect calendar, CRM, booking and acquisition channels to fill weak hours, recover cancellations, complete games and reactivate players — with euro-level attribution and no new daily operator role.
What could the capacity that expires unsold today be worth?
The simulator separates unsold capacity, addressable leakage and illustrative recovery. It does not treat every empty hour as recoverable revenue.
Use your club numbers
Illustrative model before the Audit.
Illustrative model, not a forecast. Assumes €249/month + 8% of recovered gross and an illustrative 8% incentive cost; the Audit replaces these inputs with real data and an agreed attribution rule.
From empty capacity to net gain
The goal is to act only on inventory where a credible intervention exists.
The difference is not sending messages. It is deciding when to act, who to target and at what cost.
The method stays inside the platform; the owner sees governance, action and financial outcome. Scoring, thresholds and sequencing remain proprietary.
We value each court-hour, cancellation, incomplete game and demand window.
€ opportunity queueRecency, frequency, value, preferred times, level, partners and intent form relevant cohorts.
Plausible demandOpportunity, timing, channel and intensity are prioritised without publishing the formula.
Proprietary logicWhatsApp, SMS, email, push and booking links run according to configuration and consent.
No daily operatorResponse, booking, incentive, fee and outcome are reconciled against baseline.
Net incremental €The CRM knows who is most likely to fill the next empty court.
It is not a contact database someone has to maintain. Player state changes with behaviour and feeds retention, reactivation and match-formation opportunities.
| Player | 90d | 90d value | Lifecycle | Next opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofia Martins | 11 | €412 | At risk | Tue 11:00 |
| João Costa | 18 | €633 | Active | Open match |
| Inês Rocha | 5 | €188 | Off-peak fit | Wed 13:30 |
| Miguel Pinto | 21 | €804 | High value | Protect prime |
| Rui Almeida | 2 | €66 | Dormant | Reactivate |
Sofia Martins
Behavioural profileUse marketplaces for reach. Own the repeat relationship.
FillMyCourt becomes the operating core for availability, booking, CRM and attribution. External channels remain useful for acquiring new demand, while the club can increase direct booking where contracts, APIs, consent and data rights allow.
One operating source for customer, availability, attribution and economics.
How much do you pay today to repeat bookings through external channels?
Enter the actual blended commission in your contract. Payment processing is not the same as a marketplace/platform fee and is not included.
The club keeps its brand. The cross-club network brings new demand. FillMyCourt powers both.
The player does not need a public FillMyCourt account. The core can power a club white-label app and an international discovery/booking experience, both carrying “Powered by FillMyCourt”.
White-label Club App
Thu 19:30 · 3/4 · level 3.2–3.8
International Booking Network
Discover clubs, courts and open matches across cities.
Portable player layer
- identity and consent
- sport / level / public profile
- portable preferences where authorised
- cross-club booking identity
Private club CRM layer
- spend and visit history
- churn / lifecycle status
- internal segmentation and notes
- club-specific communication and LTV
A booking can also trigger recording, streaming, analysis and social content.
FillMyCourt does not need to reinvent computer vision. The platform links booking and the player record to specialised video, scoring and analysis providers.
Padel/tennis with session linkage, video, shot tracking, stats, score and highlights.
Player recording, instant replay, AI highlights, coaching markup and social sharing.
Cloud capture/broadcast, third-party camera ingest and workflows for larger operations.
Squash makes its Olympic debut at Los Angeles 2028. That increases the strategic value of streaming, match presentation and digital player experiences.
LA28 official squash page ↗The report does not count clicks. It counts what changed in the P&L.
A simple view links baseline, opportunities, actions, bookings, costs and outcome. Operational detail remains available; the owner gets accountability in euros.
Revenue recovery becomes a measurable operating function.
FillMyCourt follows opportunities through to outcome while staff run the club. The goal is to make revenue recovery an installed function, not a front-desk task list.
Revenue-first on top. Modular SaaS underneath.
A club can start over the current stack and move booking, CRM and operations into the FillMyCourt core when control and economics justify it.
Revenue Automation
Leak detection, prioritisation, activation, match completion and attribution.
Primary differentiatorAutomated CRM
Behavioural profiles, lifecycle, LTV context, consent and segments.
CoreBooking & Inventory
Native booking, visual calendar, pricing, waitlists, policies and reservation integrity.
CoreDistribution Connectors
External booking/discovery channels via authorised APIs and adapters.
Connector layerMedia & Performance
Video-provider connectors, live/replay, analytics metadata and player content.
Integration layerEnterprise Control
Hierarchy, central policy, local autonomy, BI, roles, white-label and APIs.
Scale layerFrom one venue to distributed networks without rebuilding the data model.
The architecture is designed to keep local control and central governance as venues, courts, markets and booking volume grow.
Hierarchy
Network → region → organisation → venue → court with central governance and local autonomy.
Multi-tenant designConcurrency
Reservation locks, idempotent writes, queues and conflict prevention for high volume.
Booking integrityMulti-market
Timezone-safe scheduling, languages, currencies and a regional deployment path.
Scale pathSecurity & API
Tenant isolation, roles, an MFA/SSO path, audit logs, APIs, webhooks and connector permissions.
Enterprise controlThe questions that matter before changing your stack.
Do I have to replace my current booking system?
No. FillMyCourt can start as a revenue/CRM layer over the current stack. Native booking and migration become options when they improve control, margin or experience.
Does staff need to operate another CRM?
The goal is the opposite. Segments, opportunity queues and routine actions update automatically; the team supervises exceptions and results.
Can I keep using marketplaces?
Yes. The strategy is to keep channels that bring incremental demand and increase direct repeat booking where contracts, APIs, consent and economics justify it.
Do provider names imply partnership?
No. They are examples of systems relevant to connector/integration targets. We only communicate a partnership or live integration after validation.
Does the Audit guarantee a return?
No. The Audit exists to measure the economic case before installing workflows or promising uplift.
Show us the calendar. We will show you where the money is.
In five business days we turn 4–12 weeks of authorised data into a leakage map, CRM opportunity segments, a booking-stack assessment and a one-page business case.
Solutions by club need
Specific pages for operators evaluating management software, CRM, booking, squash workflows or marketplace dependence.
Measure before you buy software.
Calculators and scorecards that turn occupancy, fees and stack choices into an economic decision.
Revenue leak calculator
Unsold capacity → addressable leakage → illustrative net recovery.
Free toolMarketplace fee calculator
Compare distribution cost and eligible direct repeat booking.
Free toolClub software scorecard
12 criteria for comparing booking, CRM, automation and customer control.
Buyer guide + CSV